Expert Economists on Climate Change and the need to act

From treehugger

“The excellent Climate Consensus blog over at The Guardian just reported on some interesting research based on a survey of expert climate economists.

The result?

Of those economists who had actually engaged substantively with the issue of climate change—meaning they had published on the topic in highly regarded, peer reviewed journals—a full 95 percent of them argue that the United States should follow through on its commitment to cut carbon emissions. Furthermore, 77 percent believed we should cut carbon emissions unilaterally—whether or not other countries commit to cutting theirs.”

Posted in CO2, Global Warming | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Construction Industry Commitments to reduce Embodied Carbon

This post has now been updated.

In the lead up to COP21 in Paris, a number of companies made high profile commitments to reduce their carbon impact, but companies such as Interface, Wilmott Dixon and Marshalls have been making serious commitments to reduce the embodied carbon associated with their products or buildings for many years.

What is important for me is that the number of companies who have made commitments on embodied carbon is growing.

In this blog, I want to highlight the companies within the construction and property sector that have made public commitments to reduce the impacts of their manufacturing processes, or the impacts of their products – both of which should reduce the embodied carbon of construction products, or who have committed to reduce the embodied carbon of the buildings they commission, design, build or operate.

I am sure there are many more companies not listed here, please let me know via comments and I will update the list.  Pledges taken from UKGBC or the Whitehouse American Business Act on Climate Pledge if no other link provided.

AkzoNobel ” We are committed to increasing our resource efficiency across the value chain to reduce our environmental footprint and to create more value from fewer resources. We target 25-30% improvements in resource efficiency and energy use across the entire value chain by 2020 (measured by cradle to grave carbon footprint reduction). ”

 

British Land: ” By 2020 we will deliver a 15% reduction in landlord embodied carbon intensity for projects over £50m against 2015 per m² .”

Carillion: “Carillion are working alongside other industry leaders, companies and government authorities to achieve effective, lasting carbon reduction at scale. We all committed to cut 24 million tonnes of carbon from UK infrastructure contracts by 2050 under the Infrastructure Carbon Review.”

 

Feilden Clegg Bradley: “We pledge to continue its work in low energy design and in particular:  1) To examine ways of reducing to embodied carbon in our buildings, ”

Greengage: ” We will provide bespoke advice to each and every client to enable them to understand what they can do to achieve meaningful long term action against climate change. We will focus on the three key areas of energy management, embodied carbon reduction and climate change adaptation and mitigation. ”

HAB: “We will also target significant reductions in embodied carbon in construction”.

HS2: ” We commit to minimising the carbon footprint of HS2 as far as practicable and to delivering low carbon long distance journeys that are supported by low carbon energy. To support this we will set carbon targets and work with our supply chain to manage and minimise carbon emissions associated with the construction and operation of HS2″.

Hanson Heidelberg Cement: ” We have targets to reduce carbon emissions by 10 per cent and energy emissions by 5 per cent per tonne of product by 2020 based on a 2010 baseline”.

Interface: “Interface established its Mission Zero® promise to eliminate any negative impact the company has on the environment by 2020 and, supported by our entrepreneurial spirit, we’re well on our way to achieving it”.

“If we’re successful, we’ll spend the rest of our days harvesting yester-year’s carpets and other petrochemically derived products, and recycling them into new materials; and converting sunlight into energy; with zero scrap going to the landfill and zero emissions into the ecosystem. And we’ll be doing well … very well … by doing good. That’s the vision.” Ray Anderson, 1997.

Kingspan: “We commit to achieving net zero energy across all sites by 2020, with an interim target of 50% by 2016. ”

Lafarge Holcim globally: We will continue with our mission to cut our net CO2 emissions by 40% per ton of cement by 2030 (vs 1990).  We will continue to develop and market innovative products and services to prevent 10 million tons of CO2 being released every year from buildings and infrastructure.

Laing O’Rourke: ” We will produce independently-verified carbon footprints for our main off-site manufactured (pre-cast) products by 2020 and we will reduce our direct carbon emissions by 50% by 2020 (compared to 2009 baseline).

Marshalls: “This policy applies to all Marshalls businesses and covers our direct and indirect emissions, including our supply chain. The policy requires Marshalls to:
• Reduce our corporate Green House Gas (GHG) emissions by at least 15% by 2012, 26% by 2020 and 80% by 2050. These reductions are measured against a 1990 baseline.
• Begin this process with a 2,000 tCO2e pa reduction year on year initially.
• Reduce specific emissions (in terms of kgCO2e/t of finished product) by 3% pa.”

Mitsubishi Electric: “We will aim to reduce CO2 emissions from product usage by 30% (2001 baseline) and CO2 emissions from production by 30% (1991 baseline), both by 2021.”

SKANSKA: “Our Journey to Deep Green™ has put climate and resource considerations at the heart of our business planning since 2010. Through our Journey to Deep Green™ we define Green and Deep Green Targets in our business plans.”

Sturgis Carbon Profiling: “We will continue to provide leadership to educate, inform and encourage those we work with to deliver truly low carbon buildings through ‘Whole Life’, ie both Embodied and Operational emissions reductions. We will also work to deliver a UK wide implementation plan for delivering Whole Life Carbon reductions in accordance with BS EN 15978 by mid 2017. ”

Tata Steel: “As proud members of ULCOS (Ultra-Low CO2 Steelmaking Partnership) which has the stated goal of developing technologies capable of reducing the CO2 emissions of steel production by 50% by 2050, and as host to its leading pilot project, Hisarna, we will continue to invest in research & development in the search for ways to reduce CO2 emissions through breakthrough technology.”

Willmott Dixon: “Reduce carbon intensity by 50% by 2020, compared with 2010.”

Yorkshire Water: “Yorkshire Water has recently endorsed the Government’s Infrastructure Carbon Review and, in doing so, made a number of commitments to reduce carbon in the construction, operation and maintenance of our assets. One of these commitments is that by 2020 we aspire to be halving the carbon emissions embodied in the new assets we build, compared to a 2015 baseline. We believe that this will not only reduce carbon but also help us to find new cost efficiencies.”

Posted in CO2, Embodied Impacts, Global Warming | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Happy Christmas, and an upcycled post to end 2015!

Wishing all my readers a Happy Christmas and my best wishes for 2016!

Firstly, if you wish to celebrate in Australia, here are some sustainable beers and an article from CAMRA about sustainable brewing in the UK.

The Australian Conservation Foundation have estimated the environmental impact of Christmas in Australia and it is not a pleasant prospect with their alcohol consumption over the season responsible for 42,000 Olympic sized swimming pools of water and 780 ktonnes of CO2 produced from the manufacture of electrical appliance bought in December.

Below, are some ideas and research to help you minimise the impact of your own festive activities.

eCO2greetings have estimated the carbon impact of ecards versus posted cards, and Huffington Post provide some ideas for low impact Christmas decorations.
If you are interested in the question of which has the lowest environmental impact, then thinkstep has recently completed a peer reviewed LCA study in the US, which showed that the impacts of both were small in comparison with a family’s overall carbon footprint and neither was particular preferable. If you want to minimise your Christmas tree’s impact, then use an artificial tree for as long as possible, dispose of either type of tree sensibly (see below) and try to source your tree locally. Other studies, such as that by ellipsos in Canada, found the artificial tree would have higher impact (20 years of use were required for the natural tree option to be worse for climate change).

But if you are not enamoured of real or artificial trees, then take a look at some amazing images of trees using recycled materials, bicycles, bottles, shopping trolleys…:

And at the end of the festive season, follow the links for information on what to do with your tree and other Christmas waste.

Merry Christmas!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why I’m not so happy about the outcome of #COP21

cop-21-paris-climate-conference-summit

It could have been a whole lot worse, but it needed to be a whole lot better.  Our kids have a lot of work to do.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Climate Change and the need to act…

In alphabetical order, here are links to my blogs on how a wide range of influential people and organisations talking about what needs to be done (and what they are doing in some cases) about Climate Change.

The British Public

The Director General of the Confederation of British Industry

The European Environment Agency

Global Companies

The Governor of the Bank of England

Irish Business

The National Trust

Pope Francis

The Prime Minister

The Prince of Wales

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Irish business on climate change and the need to act

Taken from the Irish Times, 27 November 2015

“Today, more Irish companies (and Irish-based companies) are embracing the concepts of carbon reduction and energy efficiency, if not for their own peace of mind, then for that of their investors and customer base.

Accordingly, latest figures from the Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland show the carbon content of electricity last year fell to half its 1990 level.

“We are at a point where what we don’t have is going out of fashion and what we do have is coming into fashion,”

“Outside of governments a lot of businesses are looking at Paris in the sense that the world is changing,” says the authority’s chief executive, Dr Brian Motherway, who believes the days of companies not really engaging are over. “They know change is coming. We need policy to evolve in terms of [energy] price and incentives and disincentives so we can start to change. The call is: let’s get on with it.”

Ireland is advantageously placed as a country that exploits renewable energy and doesn’t produce fossil fuels. “We are at a point where what we don’t have is going out of fashion and what we do have is coming into fashion,” says Motherway. “Paris is going to be, in my view, a much stronger sense that things are going one way and we are getting out of fossil fuels.”

Easier and cheaper

New technologies are making energy efficiency easier and more attractive. Data handling and communications have been revolutionised and it all feeds into business. Solutions to problems are easier and cheaper.

“Five years ago if you were talking about clean energy you were probably a bit ahead of the curve. Now for any company who is looking at it strategically there is a sense of inevitability this is no longer an add-on glossy bit.

“It’s become part of the business strategy cycle. It’s about risk. It’s very much part of the boardroom conversation.”

The private sector’s response to environmental realities can be roughly divided in two parts: the corporate world pulling itself into a new frame of mind and the emergence of nascent industries capitalising on it. Of the latter, new ventures are appearing all the time. Among the recently acclaimed are Climote, which uses remote technology to control home heating.

Posted in CO2, Global Warming, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The European Environment Agency on climate change and the need to act…

Cool video!

Posted in CO2, Global Warming | Tagged | Leave a comment

Global companies on climate change and the need to act…

Taken from Money Observer, 4 November 2015

According to a report published by CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project), the number of companies now actively involved in reducing their carbon footprint has increased dramatically over the past five years.

CDP’s analysis of nearly 2,000 companies worldwide indicates that the percentage of firms with active emissions reduction initiatives in place has risen from 47 per cent in 2010 to 89 per cent in 2015.

In addition, 94 per cent of companies are now allocating responsibility for climate issues to the board or to senior management, up from just over 80 per cent five years ago.

The report also suggests that the number of companies setting firm targets to reduce emissions has also grown strongly, with 44 per cent now setting goals to reduce their total greenhouse gas emissions, up from 27 per cent in 2010. Around 50 per cent of firms also have goals to reduce emissions per unit of output, up from 20 per cent in 2010.

Commenting on the report, CDP’s executive chairman and co-founder Paul Dickinson says: ‘The influence of the corporation is mighty. The momentum of business action on climate change suggests we have reached a tipping point, where companies are poised to achieve their full potential.’Of the 1,997 companies that disclosed to CDP, 113 made the report’s ‘A List’, which features those firms excelling in their actions to mitigate climate change. The list includes a number of well-known global brands such as Apple, Microsoft and Google – the three largest ‘A-Listers’ by market capitalisation.

Those companies absent from CDP’s analysis include Berkshire Hathaway – the investment vehicle of legendary US investor Warren Buffett – Facebook and Agricultural Bank of China, which were the three largest global companies by market capitalisation that failed to disclose information to CDP.

UK companies making the A grade include retailer Sainsbury’s, consumer goods firm Unilever and brewer SAB Miller, media corporation SKY UK, international bank Standard Chartered and industrial firms Carillon and CNH Industrial.

The UK compared favourably will the rest of the world on climate action, with British firms reporting 1,090 active projects in 2015, up from 832 in 2011 – representing a 31 per cent rise compared to an average rise globally of 14 per cent.

Some UK companies are ‘looking beyond short-term policy signals to position themselves for a low-carbon future’. These include building supplies company Marshalls, which has committed to reduce emissions by 80 per cent by 2050, and pharmaceuticals giant GlaxoSmithKline, which has pledged a 100 per cent reduction by then.

The CDP says that growing momentum among the corporate world is coinciding with increasing engagement on climate change from investors. The firm claims that in 2014 $21.4 trillion (£13.8 trillion) was invested in funds with environmental, social and governance mandates, an increase of 61 per cent in two years.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CO2 emissions: if you could see what I’m talking about, would it help?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=share&v=G0OZyXHi99c

From Carbon Visuals and PWC.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The UK Public on Climate Change and the need to act

Check out my infographic  on the UK public’s attitude to Climate Change and the need to act, taken from recent Government Surveys.Public on climate change infographic

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment