-
Join 3,748 other subscribers
Author: Jane Anderson
An expert in Life Cycle Assessment for the Construction industry
my recent tweets
Tweets by constructionlcamy tags
- #ECW2014
- #ECW2014 embodiedcarbon
- #EmbCarbonAction
- 2 degrees
- A Level
- Architect
- Arctic cloudwhitening sea-ice resources
- benchmarking
- benchmarks
- BRE
- BREEAM
- capital
- capital carbon
- carbon
- CEPMC
- climate change
- CO2
- construction
- constructionproductsassociation
- consultant
- contractor
- COP21
- CPA
- CPR
- Denmark
- developer
- Digitisation
- ecobuild
- Ecolabel
- ECO Platform
- Education
- embodied
- Embodied Carbon
- EN15804
- EN 15804
- Environmental Externalities
- EPD
- events
- France
- GCB
- GCSE
- Germany
- GHG
- GPP
- greenhouse gases
- GWP
- IGT
- infographic
- ireland
- LCA
- LCC
- LEED
- Life cycle costing
- manufacturer
- NASA
- NOAA
- Norway
- oregon
- procurement
- recycling
- reduction
- regulation
- RICS
- Ska
- Spain
- standards
- steel
- Sweden
- syllabus
- TC350
- transport
- UK
- USA
- video
- Xmas
-
Recent Posts
No Instagram images were found.
Monthly Archives: May 2025
What is the story with Module D?
his article provides an overview of Module D provided in construction production EPD. It describes the background to Module D, supplementary information in the EPD which aims to provide transparency on the environmental benefits resulting from reusable products, recycled materials and recovered energy leaving a product system, However, the paper identifies and explains a number of serious limitations with Module D and its use. These limitations highlight the importance of careful consideration when using Module D in environmental assessments and comparisons, and this paper provides guidance on the appropriate use of Module D. Continue reading
Posted in Circular economy, EN 15804, EN15978, Environmental Product Declarations, EPD, Module D, Uncategorized
Tagged Circular economy, Comparison, EN 15804, EPD, Module D, Reuse
5 Comments